Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 1:04 am
April 30, 2008) (numerous deficiencies); Taylor v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
" Many collective bargaining agreements provide a similar limitation while a few agreements negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law permit the suspension of the employee against whom disciplinary charges have been filed without limitation in some instances.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:01 pm
Taylor v Solis,___F.3d___(D.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Dismissed probationary teacher presents evidence sufficient to require judicial review of whether termination was made in bad faithLisa Capece f/k/a Lisa Grande v Schultz, 2009 NY Slip Op 51679(U), Decided on August 3, 2009, Supreme Court, Richmond County, Judge Philip G. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
April 30, 2008) (numerous deficiencies); Taylor v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:20 pm
See Taylor v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:12 am
Taylor, 295 F. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 12:28 am
" Freeman v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 10:47 am
Taylor's patent upon receipt of payment of all outstanding maintenance fees.Taylor v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
However the rule is substantially similar to the federal rule, and so here's the Ninth Circuit's take on the issue (from Taylor v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
However the rule is substantially similar to the federal rule, and so here's the Ninth Circuit's take on the issue (from Taylor v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
Employer's setting out the nature of acts of misconduct that adversely impact upon the "efficiency of the service" criticalDoe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 144 (3d Cir. 2004) (applying "formal categorical approach" of Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:52 am
Taylor had an explicitly [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:00 am
From SSRN:Elliott Visconsi, The Invention of Criminal Blasphemy: Rex v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 9:00 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:27 pm
& Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
"NYPPL comment: The classic case addressing this type of distinction is Taylor v Cass, 505 N.Y.S.2d 929.Taylor, a Suffolk County employee, won reinstatement with full retroactive salary and contract benefits after the court found that he was improperly dismissed while serving a disciplinary probation.Under the terms and conditions of the probation to which Taylor had agreed, the county could terminate him without any hearing if, in the opinion of his… [read post]
