Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 3941 - 3960 of 8,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 9:21 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lastly, the court found the fourth provision exceeded authority because municipalities cannot strip constitutional rights from entities and cannot undo decisions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:45 am by DONALD SCARINCI
During the course of those federal proceedings, Wright filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Serving as Chief Justice of the United States was Duke Law School Dean, and former Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. [read post]
2 May 2009, 4:37 pm
Without the urban designation, the project cannot proceed.The proposed project located on Waikoloa, island of Hawaii, consisted of 1, 924 residential units, a 25-acre commercial parcel, a 30-acre school site to be dedicated to the State Department of Education, 26-acres of neighborhood parks, and a network of biking/walking paths. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Petitioner Akiak Native Community and other petitioners and intervenors (collectively Petitioners or Akiak) seek review of the approval by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the State of Alaska's application to assume responsibility for administration of portions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), pursuant to section 402(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:01 am by Ross Runkel
An additional “agency shop agreement” requires non-members in the bargaining unit to pay a percentage of the dues amount (an “agency fee”) to pay for the union’s expenses of performing services that benefit the bargaining unit. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6680 Issue(s): [Petitioner is a pro se prisoner and the government waived its right to respond, so we have been unable to obtain a copy of the petition.] [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
When questioned at trial, petitioner stated there were no specifics and that they “just said that we would share, we would take care of each other. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:01 am
It's said that this was a gag her fellow workers in the United States attorney's office had given her, but there are thousands of pardon petitioners who aren't laughing. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:19 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As our blog followers will know, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has drastically changed the filing procedure for submitting H-1B cap subject petitions. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:34 am by Wells C. Bennett
”  Among other things, the Court explained that it lacked the authority to address some of the alleged consequences of the petitioners’ surviving “enemy combatant” designation, such as the travel restrictions imposed by the Sudanese and Afghan Governments; and that other alleged consequences, such as the likelihood of future targeting by the United States, were too speculative in nature. *** We are just now starting to digest the two decisions;… [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
The H-1B program allows companies in the United States to temporarily employ foreign workers in occupations that require the application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and a bachelor’s degree or higher in the specific specialty, or its equivalent. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:47 am
The lack of such a finding leaves the petitioner with the burden of proving that such persecution would occur.) [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Silversmith, 699 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2011) (requiring ICRA habeas petitioner to exhaust tribal remedies) United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]