Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 3941 - 3960
of 8,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
It provides in relevant part: "The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by . . . citizens or subjects of any foreign state. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
It is an excellent primer on the interplay (or lack thereof) of copyright and fashion in the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Antreaun Rice v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
United States District Court, W.D. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:20 am
By Glen Hansen In Schmidt v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 10:22 am
See Fun v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
You in the United Nations are your brothers’ and sisters’ keepers in America, and you have the power to help us get justice for my brother George Floyd. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
The United States Supreme Court has examined the laws on sex offender registries in two cases. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
” Five years ago today, the Court issued its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:58 pm
In a recent 3rd Circuit opinion, Rea v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 12:13 am
In the instant case, the Court of Appeal held that there was no material evidence placed before the court to establish the change of name of the plaintiff-appellant company, and the resolution for change of name in Brazil that was provided before the court was deemed insufficient.[3] In Edicomsa International Inc and Associates v CITEC International Estates Ltd,[4] the plaintiff-appellant was a foreign company incorporated in the United States of America. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:50 pm
They don’t like Democrats regardless of prior law – demonstrated in cases like Bush v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
According to Sixth Circuit, the man-woman marriage laws in these states did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment—even in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
Bank of America’s Vice President, Darrell Freeman, complained to the Deputy City Attorney and the San Diego Gang Unit, which ultimately lead to the vandalism charges. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council Harvey v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:56 am
(See Moss v. [read post]
