Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 9,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
§ 4327(b). [3] See Baldwin v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:23 am
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court decided a case entitled Orr v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
Congress enacted the Magnuson-Stevens law in response to overfishing of fisheries off the coast of the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
United States 294 U.S. 330, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes rejected the narrow reading, stating ,“… its language indicates a broader connotation. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:02 am
Objecting to the fact that the "Claimant has imposed burdens on the government that it does not in fact bear," the prosecutors wield the Fourth Circuit Court case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
Tavera's motion for a new trial based on the Brady failure was still pending when the Sixth Circuit decided, in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:33 am
United States]. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 1:36 pm
This leaves Ford with the full burden of costs of the class action lawsuit. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am
Troy District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig has ruled that Michigan's motor vehicle code provision criminalizing the operation of a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance [marijuana] violates the equal protection clause of the Michigan and United States Constitutions.The case, People v Sulaka, arose in 2010 when the accused was allegedly speeding and, when pulled-over, could not produce a drivers license. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:14 am
The United States Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Further, citing Bolmer v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Further, citing Bolmer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm
From Richard v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
United States 15-245Issue: Whether the district court has jurisdiction to expunge an individual’s criminal record on equitable grounds. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
They could not remove speech glorifying terrorist attacks against the United States—unless they also remove speech decrying, memorializing, or educating about terrorist attacks against the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
In Aycock v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:47 pm
United City of Yorkville v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:33 pm
There are no facts stated that would give rise to such an onerous burden. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution.... ... [read post]
