Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 3941 - 3960 of 32,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2022, 8:46 am by Ronald Mann
DaVita (one of the two largest dialysis providers in the United States) objected, arguing that discriminating against patients who receive outpatient dialysis is the same thing as discriminating against patients with end-stage renal disease. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am by familoo
Last week saw promulgation of Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52, a summary of which you can find here. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit, about which the NYT writes: At least two climate cases are pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 11:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
And then, as today, there was debate about the proper legal characterization of those relationships.The United States Supreme Court confronted that debate in McGirt v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Asylum seekers, Rwanda and the ECtHR On 14 June, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) granted an urgent interim measure in the case of KN v United Kingdom (no. 28774/22). [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am by Ryan Goodman
Did you understand the “he,” in that email, to refer to the President of the United States? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:18 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Justice Sotomayor stated that “[o]f course, if this Court’s understanding of state law is wrong, California courts, in an appropriate case, will have the last word. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
In addition, we are not blind to the fact that an important abortion case is now pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]