Search for: "Victory v. State"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 6,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 6:49 am
The Fontaine Case as a Victory for Claimants In Fontaine v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Judge England also stated that"even if one accepts as true the allegation that a 'Sponsored link' might confuse a consumer, it is hardly likely that with several different sponsored links appearing on a page that a consumer might believe each one is the true 'producer' or 'origin' of the Styrotrim product" The only case to go to trial in the States over the AdWords issue was the 2004 Geico v Google case brought in Virginia which… [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
On December 10, 2009, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument in Vizio, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Oklahoma, calling it a victory for Native women. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:56 am
In Arbor Hill v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 11:49 am
” The Doyle v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
A medical-device company won such a victory in April. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am
Maybe the truism should be "unreasonable to one jurist is victorious to another. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am
Maybe the truism should be "unreasonable to one jurist is victorious to another. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Even when no federal law exists to conflict with state or local regulation, subnational rules can be unlawful if their burden on interstate commerce is “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits”—a test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:52 am
However, in 2012, the Court decided in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 9:18 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
James Landolt v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
That’s just what the court did in today’s case – Pearsall v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In blue New York State, where I live and work, since even before the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:46 pm
Khan is Legal Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
See Getting v. [read post]
