Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 6,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2014, 10:30 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:59 pm
This past week, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am
Briefly: Bloomberg TV has an explainer on Kirby v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
Schuette v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
After the Supreme Court’s decision last year in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
The case is Jones v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
The case is Jones v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
Gregg v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
” Pedersen v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:21 am
Sadly, government did so in this case.In 2011, he was the judge in Islamic Shura Council of Southern California v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:48 pm
There's no way the voters thought that a guy who uses a wirecutter to snip off sensor tags has should invariably stay in prison for life whereas a guy who snips 'em off with his bare hands should be let go.Just not plausible. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:37 am
Under the Supreme Court's 1968 decision in Pickering v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
Carr, Reynolds v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
The Court of Appeal in the case of Arewa Textiles Plc & Others v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:03 pm
Well, deaf to both the voters’ will and to the SJC’s 2011 ruling on pot and warrantless searches, another police department pushed the envelope on this issue, and was soundly rejected: In Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 4:41 am
A JUDGMENT IN PARR V. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) before adopting an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative pursuant to Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a)? [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:07 am
Seeking to enforce the will of Colorado voters, who amended their state constitution to guarantee reasonable school funding, citizens from around Colorado filed a lawsuit, Dwyer v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 11:02 pm
Finally, 13% of voters thought that US fair use makes a real difference indeed, in that it unduly limits the rights of rightholders.It would now seem that - should a contingent of IPKat readers be put in charge of copyright policy at the Commission level - not only would the EU provide for more exceptions and limitations to copyright, but actually go for an open-ended system. [read post]
