Search for: "Any and All Under-Tenants "
Results 3961 - 3980
of 4,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 2:42 pm
As any housing lawyer well knows, this has been a vexed topic. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
Nor is there any evidence that tends to discredit the truth-value of the documentary proof. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:58 pm
In almost all cases the Local Authority will not re-house until this is done, and sometimes the tenant will not be re-housed until a day or so before the bailiff is due! [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:24 pm
Minors (i.e. children under 18) cannot own a ‘legal estate in land’, although they can be (and often are) a beneficiary The legal owners of land will hold it as ‘joint tenants’. [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:27 pm
Any competent attorney should be able to handle certain landlord/tenant matters. [read post]
15 May 2011, 4:14 pm
However, if the landlord does not permit the dog on the property, then the landlord is not liable under this statute; nor would the landlord, or any other statutory "owner," be liable for injuries caused by anything other than dog - i.e. damages caused by the Plaintiff him/herself. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:00 am
In short, both sides do wretchedly not even counting all the hours of anxiety that went into the fight. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:53 am
If he used company funds to pay for the portrait, he should be disciplined for violating the company’s ethics policy and could also face emotional distress claims by all who were forced to work under its Dwight-ish gaze all day. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:29 am
Litigation can be drawn out for years with various pre-trial, discovery and appeals processes, all while attorneys’ billable hours soar. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:13 pm
Any area of land. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:59 am
Under the “if you could theoretically understand it, it’s not misleading” theory, then it might well be a violation of the First Amendment to prohibit the Webloyalty business model because Webloyalty’s disclosures are strictly truthful, if you read them all the way through. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:30 am
Once lawyers became involved any thought of settling before thousands of dollars in legal fees are spent is lost. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:51 am
Under bridges, yes, but not dumpster. [read post]
6 May 2011, 12:20 am
Thinking outside the box The weirdest story that came my way, via a reader on this site was the marvelous tale in Kent local newspaper, of a landlord Chanjit Lehd, who chucked all of his tenant’s belongings out on the street. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:17 pm
The Landlord terminated under provision 2. [read post]
5 May 2011, 3:51 pm
This allows the original lender to avoid any financial liability when the loan goes under, but failed securitized loans eventually triggered a financial crisis. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:15 pm
Today, letters of credit are routinely requested by landlords as security deposits under commercial leases, and they are also used by tenants as security for landlords' tenant improvement allowances. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:57 pm
For example, a landlord may be liable if one of his tenants' dogs bites someone under certain circumstances. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:26 pm
The court shall also state its reasons for any other determination. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:15 am
The most logical and important of all. [read post]
