Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 11:46 pm
General Cable Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:00 pm
A recent Court of Appeal decision, Bottini v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
I do, but mostly for the fair use case that it precipitated, Sony Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:00 am
In the recent case of Love v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
I do, but mostly for the fair use case that it precipitated, Sony Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
I do, but mostly for the fair use case that it precipitated, Sony Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See, Marbury v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:01 am
Litigation battles over the “Assortmart Emoji Beach Ball Product Page” on Amazon.com * Wired: How Auschwitz Christmas Ornaments Ended Up for Sale on Amazon * Rosenblatt v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm
See Lopez v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
Such claims face an uphill battle under Vieth v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:32 am
Hearthware, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 5:29 am
In the wake of last year’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in his battle for access to DNA evidence that he says will prove his innocence. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:14 pm
Bush and Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
Last week's decision in Carr v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
Initiatives are underway in multiple states, and it varies by state whether Democrats or (as in Arizona) Republicans take the lead.On the other side of the Big Pond, Apple's purely pretextual defenses of its app store monopoly are falling apart. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:41 am
Undeterred by the narrow question on which the Court granted cert., thirteen state petitioners ask it to overrule Massachusetts v. [read post]
