Search for: "Bodie v Bodie"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 21,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2020, 6:28 am
In 2018, Mitchell sought to reopen his post-conviction proceedings in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
The Supreme Court held, in the Minor v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:37 pm
If a body of professional opinion overlooks an obvious risk which could have been guarded against, it will not be reasonable, even if that opinion is almost universally held (Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:19 am
Anderson, Vander Jagt v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:42 am
AU New Haven, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
Sen v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 9:05 am
In Henry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 6:23 am
Apple and Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 5:00 pm
The DOJ v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:05 am
In sum, registering 3D shapes as trade marks is a challenging – if not often chimeric – endeavour.In addition, the decision also adds to the body of cases (and literature) which shows how thorny the issue of polls is. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
It that respect it represents a middle ground from which one might better consider changes to the way that lawyer regulatory bodies are approaching the quite crucial question of lawyer engagement with core principles of human rights in a UNGP context.It is with this in mind that it is possible to more clearly and dispassionately consider the "interesting spat" that recently emerged into public view, precipitated by efforts of the Norwegian Bar to draft mandatory provisions… [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 10:54 am
Patane v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
Mayhew v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
” The majority emphasizes that, in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:53 am
Sen v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
For example, in Ashwander v Tennessee Valley Authority, the Supreme Court explained that Article 3 prevents the court from considering “the constitutionality of legislation in a friendly, non-adversary proceeding,” as with abstract review. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm
Henry v. [read post]
