Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 48,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2013, 7:19 pm
Lavender v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 5:45 am
A few months ago I wrote about the Fourth Circuit decision in Shammas v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
Sharp v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:38 pm
In MusclePharm Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:09 pm
The case is Clark v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Cicle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:09 pm
The Bare v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:28 am
Whitehead and Another v Hibbert Pownall & Newton (a Firm) Court of Appeal “Where solicitors had negligently failed to prosecute a claim for damages for clinical negligence on behalf of a mother in respect of future losses for a wrongful birth, those losses were curtailed by the death of the mother; the solicitors were not liable in a subsequent claim for professional negligence brought on behalf of the mother's estate for what amounted to a windfall in that, had her… [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:20 pm
In today’s case (Deo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 3:04 am
Lessard v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
In Brady v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
We are discussing Portnoy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Recall that Connecticut v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 7:32 am
” In Brockhouse v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:06 pm
AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:15 pm
Counsel responded that the fees were analogous to a Supreme Court case distinguished by the Appellate Court below, Galowich v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 5:17 am
Clark v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:50 am
The result was Seabron v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:44 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Halbig v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
I wondered that myself.In AFFIRMING Suffolk Supreme's dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for invasion of privacy against Allstate (with costs), the Second Department held:New York State does not recognize the common-law tort of invasion of privacy except to the extent it comes within Civil Rights Law § § 50 and 51 (see Ram v Moritt, 205 AD2d 516, 517; see also Cohen v Herbal Concepts, 63 NY2d 379). [read post]
