Search for: "D. Andrews" Results 3961 - 3980 of 6,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2017, 12:01 pm by Robert B. Lamm
  If I had a nickel for every time one of them told me “But nobody told me I’d have to do that when we went public”, I’d have lots of nickels. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:40 am by Katie Cambrook (Bristows)
The SPC application therefore did not satisfy Article 3(d) of the SPC Regulation. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
  If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, or op-ed relating to the Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:39 am by Lovechilde
In truth, if they had their way we’d be back in the late nineteenth century — before the federal income tax, antitrust laws, the pure food and drug act, and the Federal Reserve. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Marcia Coyle reports that “[d]uring U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Kenneth Anderson
 (If you’d like a way in to the theory of the New Class, this mid-1990s review essay of mine on lawyers and the New Class is a place to start.) [read post]
7 May 2018, 8:17 pm by Jeremy Saland
Schneiderm stated in response to one of his girlfriends confronting him for his painful slap, “You’d really be surprised…A lot of women like it. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 12:04 pm by Buce
If he understood it half as well as, say, Barry Ritholtz, or Yves Smith, or Andrew Redleaf (just the the names on the surface of my cortex), he'd know just how riddled with fraudulent pretension it is. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Andrew Cohen has this post discussing Kennedy's concurrence at the WashingtonPost.com's Bench Conference blog. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports that “Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as the possible pivotal vote in what will likely be a closely divided case, asking questions that reflected both the concern for public education and for the protection of religious people. [read post]