Search for: "DOES, 1-20"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 27,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 6:17 am
2C:16-1. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
G 3/92 [1]).[3.1.10] As the Board has decided in its decision J 33/03 [2.1], contrary to the decision to stay the proceedings according to Rule 14(1), it is in the discretion of the Office to decide whether the proceedings are to be continued under R 14(3). [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Doe points out that as early as November 20, 2023, the Portland Press Herald published a news article about the lawsuit. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 11:00 am
Buzzi – [1]. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 7:06 am
But, how does a second job or overtime affect an Illinois divorce? [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 4:54 am
This does not constitute an exhaustive list of measures proposed by the UK Government. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 10:33 am
She observed that the rule is 15 or 20 years old at this point, and previous Chair Jay Clayton discussed it during his tenure, in addition to Gensler talking about it currently.One important aspect is that the protection in Rule 10b5-1 is an affirmative defense, not a silver bullet, said Avakian. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:19 am
DMV published its proposed temporary rules on September 1. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 5:35 am
Internal Revenue Service data does not indicate any substantial tax preference for the fossil fuel industry, rather indicating the industry pays relatively high levels of tax. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:28 am
Lieberman, No. 1:20-cv-02148 (D.D.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
"Arnold J however qualified question 3(b) as follows, at para. 20: "... [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:39 pm
Comments on the proposal will be accepted through August 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:19 pm
ComplexDiscovery anonymizes responses to this survey and does not share any individual or organizational contact data, demographics or answers. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:40 pm
Therefore, the measure provides for a significant lower level of taxation and deserves an assessment under the Code.Criterion 1 – Targeting non-residents: The law adopted on 4 September 2018 does not distinguish between transactions with resident and non-resident in order for the tax reduction to be granted. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 10:01 pm
Attorney’s Office in San Francisco does not like it, but Jesse J. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 4:21 am
Alleman, at 453 n.1.Download PDF file of Alleman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:32 am
It doesn't appear to be up online yet, but if it does, I'll provide a link. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 7:31 pm
As a result, this latest dip in the ratio does NOT represent an actual decline in initial claims in 2020. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Does that mean that the Law Society is empowered to intervene in private litigation in order to advance the cause of justice? [read post]