Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 4,537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2010, 5:55 pm
The book is Red Families v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
Moreover, I would argue that plea bargaining in this country is in a constant state of flux, especially in the wake of the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:26 am
Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm
Hierarchical crimes which focus on the domination of a subordinated victim present different concerns than the types of crime anticipated by our doctrine of confrontation ….The article concludes by proposing the partial unincorporation of the Confrontation Clause as it applies to victims of domestic violence in state courts. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
Heller applies to the states. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
Manara explained the inception of the early litigation against eBay and Google as the high water mark of third party liability in France – Hermès v eBay, Dior v eBay, etc. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:28 pm
Two cases, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:50 am
Maron v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:09 am
It should keep in mind, however, that whether the Legislature has met its constitutional obligations in that regard is within the province of this Court (see Marbury v Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177 [1803]). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
School Dist. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
v=9KLy150NR_U&eurl=http://www.celebstoner.com/news/marijuana-news/marijuana-advocate-author-dr. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:05 am
Here is the abstract: This article takes seriously Justice Scalia’s facetious aside in Giles v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
Unlike United States works, there is no requirement for the foreign works to have been registered in the US Copyright Office. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm
In this regard, it is reminiscent of the early Sherman Act decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:34 pm
” Now, about $50-million a year more over and above is being demanded by a collective dominated by the American dominated record labels for this right in addition to amounts now collected by composers, authors and publishers. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:45 am
(With the limited exception of Cooper v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
In rejecting this argument, the court stated clearly that “the beholdenness or dominance of any director is irrelevant because there is no fear that the dominating director, without a personal or adverse interest, will do anything contrary to the best interest of the company and its stockholders. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
Audubon Soc’y v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 8:22 am
The DoJ stated that the first settlement exploited the rights of the absent class members, and therefore fell foul of Rule 23. [read post]
