Search for: "Daniel v. Daniel" Results 3961 - 3980 of 7,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports on Epic Systems v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:42 pm
On July 13, instead of scheduling a biopsy, ICE brought Castaneda to the emergency room at Scripps Mercy Chula Vista.The emergency room physician noted the fungating lesion on Castaneda's penis and referred Castaneda to urologist Daniel Hunting, M.D., who, following a brief examination, determined that the lesion was "probably condyloma," or genital warts. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:34 pm
In Pinkerton v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:38 am by Susan Brenner
  This, according to the Court of Appeals’ opinion, is how the case arose:Hafer worked at JCPenney with Danielle Gardullo in the catalog department in Manhattan, Kansas. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:06 am by Susan Brenner
As Daniels was opening the bag, [Rowell said] he believed the officers needed to obtain a search warrant to open it. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
Daniel Solove comments on the Supreme Court confirmation process more generally at Concurring Opinions, calling for term limits for Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 1:50 am by Florian Mueller
Daniel Voss ("Voß" in German) of one of the three patent-specialized divisions of the Dusseldorf Regional Court said that they--apparently speaking for his court, not just his chamber--would no longer seek a review of the Sisvel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court is "not bound to adhere to federal standing requirements" (US Bank N.A. v Nelson, 36 NY3d 998, 1003 n 4 [2020] [Wilson, J., concurring]), under New York law, plaintiffs must nevertheless demonstrate that they suffered an "injury in fact" (Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Daniels, 33 NY3d 44, 50 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court is "not bound to adhere to federal standing requirements" (US Bank N.A. v Nelson, 36 NY3d 998, 1003 n 4 [2020] [Wilson, J., concurring]), under New York law, plaintiffs must nevertheless demonstrate that they suffered an "injury in fact" (Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Daniels, 33 NY3d 44, 50 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]