Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 3961 - 3980 of 4,614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
Rule 41 does not discuss the potential content of a reply brief other than to note that the reply brief “shall not include any new or non-admitted amendment, or any new or non-admitted affidavit or other evidence. 37 C.F.R. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:01 pm by Steve Hall
That includes $1 billion promised to public schools and preschool programs, and nearly $800 million owed to universities and community colleges. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Dan Koewler
(4) Did the person refuse to take a screening test provided for by section 169A.41 (preliminary screening test)? [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am by Sean Wajert
., 41 F.3d 1103 (7th Cir. 1994) (applying Illinois law); Crossfield v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am by John L. Welch
CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b)Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:Precedential No. 46: TTAB Finds Two "ANTHONY'S" Marks Confusingly Similar for Pizza RestaurantsPrecedential No. 44: TTAB Decides "CAB CALLOWAY" Priority Dispute, Rules that Personal Names Are Inherently DistinctivePrecedential No. 43: TTAB Enters Partial Summary Judgment in 2(d) "VUDU" OppositionPrecedential No. 41: Applicant Loses Third-Party Registration Battle, TTAB… [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm by Greg May
Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1, 7 (Decker) [because dismissal of attempted murder charges “was based on undisputed facts,” it constituted “a legal conclusion subject to independent review on appeal”].)The trial court? [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:31 am by admin
Does this mean that, except for the millions of houses held by banks, the rest of us are in pricing equilibrium? [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am by John L. Welch
TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusal of "AUGUSTINER" for Beer in View of Identical Mark for Same Goods TTAB Summarily Cancels "PLAID" Registration Under Section 2(d) AUSTINUTS Seeks Review of TTAB 2(d) Decision in Austin Federal District Court Precedential No. 46: TTAB Finds Two "ANTHONY'S" Marks Confusingly Similar for Pizza Restaurants Precedential No. 44: TTAB Decides "CAB CALLOWAY" Priority Dispute, Rules that Personal Names Are Inherently Distinctive TTAB… [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:35 pm by Glen Neeley
City Weekly wrote about the case earlier this year [see “Wheels of Justice,” April 1]. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 7:10 am by Kelly
What does all of this get us? [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:08 am by Kevin Jon Heller
Broken into its component parts, the paragraph does four things: 1. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:59 am
All perishable foods must be held cold (41°F or below) or hot (140°F or above) during transit. [read post]