Search for: "English v. English"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 9,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2013, 8:21 am
In Intellectual Ventures I LLC, et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 1:33 am
Based on a litigation agreement pursuant to Sections 119b (2), 184a (3) of the German Courts Constitution Act on the first instance jurisdiction of the Commercial Court and on the conduct of proceedings in English, the article analyses details of the newly created procedural instruments and their implementation in practice. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:37 am
’ Merriam Webster's Dictionary of English Usage 677 (1989). [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
In the case of Rubio Dosamantes v Spain (Judgment of 21 February 2017)(in French only) the Third Section held that the dismissal of the applicant’s domestic claims was a breach of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
This post concerns the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-362/14: Schrems v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 9:48 am
” Courts Interpreting Emojis Citing the Oxford English Dictionary, the court defines an emoji as “a small digital image or icon used to express an idea, emotion, etc., in electronic communications. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
Foxworth v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:07 pm
Sweet.I'm calling it Judge Smith's most important contribution to the English language. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:16 pm
Even though Ibarra speaks Spanish, he repeated his request in English. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
I'm talking English and citing cases and understand precedent and the like, so I am "competent" in a way. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:02 pm
This comes in a written judgment ([2021] EWHC 510 (Ch)) peppered with language which, from an English judge, usually indicates contempt or irritation. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
Against the backdrop of this coverage, the English and Welsh press protested vigorously about their being prevented from publishing information. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 6:28 am
Papakosmas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:49 am
I do believe that Brown v. [read post]
