Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 15,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 6:21 am
In Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:30 pm
Brewer and Gagnon v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:14 am
” By applying false figures, Hugh allegedly reduced the purchase price by $1.5 million. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:28 pm
In Nisei Farmers League v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:36 am
Rebutting §102-rejections under Net MoneyIN v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
The UK High Court decision in Regen Lab v Estar confounds any such expectation. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:27 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
John Reed Stark As cybersecurity has become an increasingly important consideration for all corporate operations, one of the most pernicious problems has been the rise of so-called “ransomware” attacks – that is, systems breaches in which hackers take control of corporate networks and demand ransom payments as a condition of unlocking the systems. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:04 pm
See Case C-131/12: Google Spain SL & Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) & Mario Costeja González. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:39 pm
Kagan took the biggest jump from the first sitting in the figure to the third. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
” The judge awarded a global general damages figure of £40,000 for libel and harassment, noting that he considered that the harassment alone would fall in the upper Vento band for distress damages arising form harassment (now £25,200–£42,000 as per the Presidential Guidance from the Employment Tribunals following De Souza v Vinci Construction (UK) Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 879). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 2:14 pm
But that's clearly what Congress requires.Not difficult.If you fail to figure that out, you can be sued in a class action.Which is a pain. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
The sheer volume of cases may have made the relists likely, so the justices and the clerks have the breathing room to figure out how to resolve each of the cases in light of that decision. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
Michael Risch of the Written Description Blog shares his opinion on the subject and with a view to the ongoing Oracle v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
The new case, Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:19 am
In the last two years, fueled by a series of high profile cases involving media executives, entertainers, and other public figures, #MeToo has gained worldwide recognition as a symbol of the burgeoning movement against sexual harassment and assault, especially in the workplace. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm
“(v) Section 111(b), relating to assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees using a deadly or dangerous weapon or inflicting bodily injury. [read post]
