Search for: "French v. French" Results 3961 - 3980 of 5,348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2011, 12:26 pm by David Lat
In 1993, Judge O’Scannlain wrote the majority opinion in Kreisner v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
The IPKat's excellent and scholarly friend Norman Siebrasse tells him that he has recently become aware of a recent Canadian decision, Nazerali v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:41 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
We will show that "contra non valentem" in Louisiana is the fruit of French doctrine and jurisprudence. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:51 pm by Team
On September 27th 2011, the 5th section of the Court ruled that the application was only admissible for the lack of ground of the criminal judgment, and communicated the application to the agent of French Republic with questions to be answered within 16 weeks. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:51 pm by Team
On September 27th 2011, the 5th section of the Court ruled that the application was only admissible for the lack of ground of the criminal judgment, and communicated the application to the agent of French Republic with questions to be answered within 16 weeks. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm by Team
On February 22th 2011, the application was communicated to the agent of the French government with questions to be answered within 16 weeks. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm by Team
On February 22th 2011, the application was communicated to the agent of the French government with questions to be answered within 16 weeks. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:25 am by blogarbadmin
Relying on article VII of the NYC, the Court was able to bypass the ground for non-recognition under article V 1 (e) – noting that such ground does not exist in the French arbitration law. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am by J
The White Book, Woodfall and one county court case (Hillbrow (Richmond) Ltd v Alogaily 2005) say that a default judgment isn't good enough. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am by J
The White Book, Woodfall and one county court case (Hillbrow (Richmond) Ltd v Alogaily 2005) say that a default judgment isn't good enough. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:51 pm by lawmrh
Justice Thomas famously dissented in the excessive punishment prison inmate case of Hudson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
The history of how this came to be is vexed, and we need not review the involved story of the roles variously played by Professor Glueck, Colonel Chanler, Colonel Bernays, President Roosevelt, Secretary Stimson, Justice Jackson, and Baron Shawcross that led to framing the trial around the crime of aggressive war.[11] As Jonathan Bush has demonstrated, the decision made for sharp disagreements not only among the Allied powers – the French in particular never accepted this stratagem… [read post]