Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 3961 - 3980 of 4,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
– Myriad stock prices: Association of Molecular Pathology v USPTO (Innovationpartners) US: Federal judge in Myriad patent case says invalidation of gene patents does not violate TRIPS: Association of Molecular Pathology v USPTO (KEI) US: ACLU gene patent decision from an investor’s perspective: A black eye for the US patent system: Association of Molecular Pathology v USPTO (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: Association of Molecular Pathology v USPTO:… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am by Rosalind English
Athough the Strasbourg Courg had established that the concept of civil rights was autonomous, and not solely defined by signatory countries (Konig v Germany (No1) (A/27) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 ECHR), nevertheless Article 6 could only apply to civil rights that were arguably recognised under domestic law ( as established by the House of Lords in Matthews v Ministry of Defence (2003) UKHL 4, (2003) 1 AC 1163 applied). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
It also noted that Barbara Becker had ‘acquired celebrity status’ in Germany, while the name Becker was generally recognised as an ordinary and widespread surname. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
In other words, the best bet for a swift and authoritative resolution of this issue is for ONEL v OMEL to go all the way to the European Union's Court of Justice.The invention of Dr Nakamats. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
  The following Declaration was then adopted: On 23-25 March 2010, more than 50 judges and other experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Egypt, Germany, India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America, including experts from the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss cross-border family relocation. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:44 am
The UK Supreme Court will be making a decision in the case of Rademacher v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:45 am
INPI (EPLAW) Lyrica (Pregabalin) – US: Patent infringement complaint filed following a Para IV certification: Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:46 am by Ray Dowd
Cassirer was forced to sell the work in 1939 in exchange for passage out of Germany. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:28 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Adsani v UK cannot be said to have settled the controversy, and the issue has returned to the Court in Jones v UK, as well as being put before the International Court of Justice in by Germany against Italy for failing to respect its jurisdictional immunities as a sovereign State.The conference will provide an overview of how different national courts in Europe have approached questions of the immunities of States and… [read post]