Search for: "J. H.1" Results 3961 - 3980 of 4,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
A preocupação demonstrada pelas autoridades paulistas, por certo, transcende o âmbito estadual, atingindo nível nacional (também internacional, tendo como marco legal sobre o tema a Convenção 29 da OIT) e refletindo verdadeiro anseio de toda a sociedade, que já há muito tempo manifesta o absoluto repúdio a qualquer forma de redução da dignidade do trabalhador e de sua liberdade, inclusive aquelas nas… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 7:17 am
(h) Post Notice - To display conspicuously the written announcement of a meeting in hard copy or electronic format. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
State-Wide — Pennsylvania Supreme Court — 1 Retention Only one Supreme Court position is on the ballot, and it’s the retention voter for Justice J. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canada,[6] Fish J. clearly stated that solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege were not two branches of the same tree. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Chapter Readings·      United Nations Rule of Law, “What is the Rule of Law”[1]·      Norhiro Urabe, “Rule of Law and Due Process: A Comparative View of the United States and Japan,”[2]Law and Contemporary Problems 53(1):61-72 (1990)·      David Clark, “The Many Meanings of the Rule of Law”·      Hamdi v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:19 pm by Stephen Page
”Definition of“family violence”Thecurrent definition of “family violence” in section 4(1) is to be repealed. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd (2007) EWCA Civ 1329 that test had been held to be the same as that for summary judgment. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
It goes like this:"In Case C-461/10 Bonnier Audio AB v Perfect Communication Sweden AB the Högsta domstolen in Sweden referred the following questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling:"1. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:29 am
Subsections (h), (i) & (j). - Repeals the interference proceeding authorized in § 291 and creates a new "derivation proceeding" in § 135(a), designed to determine the inventor with the right to file an application on a claimed invention. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 10:38 am by Gene Takagi
In other cases, whether a nonprofit can indemnify its agents may depend on: (1) the indemnification provisions in the organization’s governing documents (e.g., articles of incorporation, bylaws) or (2) the board’s discretion, to the extent it’s consistent with the organization’s governing documents. [read post]