Search for: "LEE V. STATE" Results 3961 - 3980 of 4,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve written this in preparation for the Supreme Court appeal in NetChoice v. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
City of Chicago, and in 2022, the Court further expanded its support for Second Amendment rights in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:57 am by admin
Smith   Wheeling gulls spin and glide You’ve got no place to hide ‘Cause you don’t need one – Crosby Stills and Nash, Lee Shore   Some cases are born momentous (NFIB v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 2:20 pm by Charlotte Butash, Margaret Taylor
Senators Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) have tweeted their displeasure. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm by admin
The Appellate Division then set out to do what Judge Viscomi had failed to do – look at the proffered opinions and assess whether they followed reasonably and reliably from the expert witnesses’ stated grounds. [read post]