Search for: "MORRIS v. MORRIS" Results 3961 - 3980 of 4,437
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 12:22 pm
Last September, Charleston Law School hosted a symposium entitled, Punitive Damages, Due Process, and Deterrence: The Debate After Philip Morris v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:29 am
Rev. 307 Charleston Law Review Spring 2008 Symposium Edition FAIRNESS THROUGH GUIDANCE: JURY INSTRUCTION ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES AFTER PHILIP MORRIS V. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:08 am
Importantly, the account here not only answers Professor Sunstein's challenge, but also promises to makes sense of the Supreme Court's recent and somewhat puzzling holding in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:26 pm
" In other words, the multi-billion dollar award, when framed as a dollar amount, rather than as a percentage of net wealth, could, after BMW v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
For example, as elaborated in Part V, there is no retributivist justification for the State Farm Court's presumption that a single-digit multiplier of compensatory damages is the appropriate measure. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:29 pm
"[5] In its recent decision on punitive damages, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:02 pm
In the court's previous punitive damages case, Philip Morris v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 9:37 am
But then again, it went generally unnoticed when a jury awarded an arbitrary $368 million in damages in that case, when the trial judge reduced that verdict to an arbitrary $150 million judgment, and when an intermediate appellate court reduced that figure to an arbitrary $82.6 million (which, with interest, works out to over $100 million).The US Supreme Court remanded to consider in light of Philip Morris v. [read post]