Search for: "Moring v. State"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 131,063
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
DigitNews has more information here. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:22 am
If enforcement is likely to be carried out in any EU Member States, then it would be more desirable to have the award confirmed by the UPC, being a court common to the EU Member States for the purpose of article 71 of the Brussel Regulation № 1215/2012 as to the recognition and enforcement of its judgements. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
It could be better and more fully explained, but it was not so opaque as to be unlawful. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 8:34 am
The Supreme Court has found the Constitution guarantees the right to counsel but allows states, in most cases, to try to recoup the costs and that more than 40 do so, according to a 2022 report by the National Legal Aid and Defender Association. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 11:36 am
From Teising v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 7:54 am
” Lutkauskas v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“The more powerful interests must be more or less reflected in legislation; which, like every other device of man or beast, must tend in the long run to aid the survival of the fittest,” Holmes wrote in a passage that Post calls the “kernel” of his jurisprudence. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 2:47 am
Halet v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 1:53 pm
Indeed, Ritchey Produce Co., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
Note: Compare with Dick Heller of Heller v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
(One has to consider whether these would pass First Amendment scrutiny, particularly in light of recent decisions such as the one in NetChoice v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:39 am
Exclusionary zoning is permitted under Euclid v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
