Search for: "POST v. STATE"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 99,779
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am
There are rare patent cases that challenge the validity of the patent statutes or the way those statutes are applied by the PTO (e.g., Apple v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:31 am
Malta V, in Valetta from 24 to 27 September 2024. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The post The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case appeared first on Just Security. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
“There is no evidence—not in the record, not anywhere—that anyone involved with [the Virality Project] ever ‘flagged’ Jill Hines or Health Freedom Louisiana, ever shared any of their posts with a social media platform, or even read their posts,” the brief states. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 3:02 pm
In Landry v. [read post]
US Supreme Court rules public officials can be sued for blocking users on social media in some cases
16 Mar 2024, 11:28 am
In one, Lindke v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:50 am
Services v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
Annor v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The plaintiffs argue that there was a “causal and temporal link” between the government’s actions and those of social media companies that affected content posted by individual plaintiffs and state officials. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:57 am
Or is this more of a Brigham City v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:12 pm
They argued that the government may hardly communicate at all with social media platforms when it detects problematic posts.Notably, the specific posts they discuss in their brief include, among other things, posts the U.S. government suspects are foreign election interference. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
In Chesanovska v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm
To the extent the Judicial Conference guidance purports to address this problem it only states that the JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet should state "the remedy sought has implication beyond the parties before the court or that the case seeks to bar or mandate statewide or nationwide enforcement of a state of federal law. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 4:26 pm
This post was authored by Amy Lavine, Esq. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:51 pm
ShareJustice Elena Kagan’s opinion for a sharply divided court in Pulsifer v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
