Search for: "People v Legall" Results 3961 - 3980 of 30,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 11:03 am by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Google’s driverless cars are now legally the same as a human driver, Feb. 10, 2016, By Brian Fung, The Washington Post More Blog Entries: Wuthrich v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
  Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:34 pm by Ed Greenlee
  The Discography contains some casebook classics, such as Campbell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 11:35 am
Apple (the computer-and-lots-of-other-stuff people) will own the Apple trademark, and license it ‘back’ to Apple (the Beatles/music/etc people) for its use. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:03 am by Jon Hyman
It is offensive that, in 2015, it is still legal to discriminate against any class of people. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am by Addie Rolnick
I have written elsewhere about how to make sense of the “racial v. political” dichotomy that that seems to trouble many people about Indian law. [read post]