Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 17,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Citing People ex rel. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Citing People ex rel. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
In S.P. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:16 am
The decision, Johnson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Monday’s grant of review in Montgomery v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
I'm certain -- or at least hope -- that this opinion corrects this practice.Though, in the meantime, there are all these people, like Mr. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 2:02 pm
Saying that if she was (after redistricting) really representing District 2 (where she lived), then that meant that there were two people representing 2 and no one representing 6, which makes no sense.Which the Court of Appeal basically agrees with. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
The state granted parole -- and the parolee accepted it -- on the condition that he subject his residence to search at the request of the police. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:56 pm
The grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Pasadena is affirmed. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:16 pm
Peterson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:41 am
Vernor v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:12 am
Dime Savings Bank of New York BRONX COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Ordered Returned for Further Proceedings Relating to Modification of Sentence to Include PRS People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm
Goodale’s other argument as to why his motion to suppress should have been granted involved “the officers' continuing seizure of his laptop without a warrant. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am
The Court considered whether domestic law governing the grant of social assistance was compliant with EU law. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
V § 13.) [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 6:03 am
Georgia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
His only argument on appeal is that the trialcourt should have granted his motion to suppress. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
