Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 4,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
In Thomson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Some parts of the Bill are organized similar to the Canada Labour Code, from employment standards to health and safety, to unionized workplaces, as follows: PART I: Preliminary Matters PART II: Employment Standards PART III: Occupational Health and Safety PART IV: Appeals and Hearings re: Parts II and III PART V: Radiation Health and Safety PART VI: Labour Relations PART VII: Public Service Essential Services (Place Holder) PART VIII: Labour-Management Actions (Temporary Measures During… [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
Use of initials and date of birth for victim did not render indictment for incest facially invalid; Court of Appeals possessed authority to issue writ of certiorari for review of SBM orders. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Union of India & Ors. 2006 (7) SCC 1, the expression "ordinary residence" as used in the Representation of People Act, 1950 fell for interpretation. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
From Hiers v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
My point here is not that pop culture references necessarily render inaccessible what would otherwise be accessible. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
Many people know that in Buck v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
GangulySupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Remdeo Chauhan @ Rajnath Chauhan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
Despite national expectations of a nonpartisan, unpolitical SCOTUS, the reality is that SCOTUS Justices are people just like anyone else. [read post]
