Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 4,044
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
Indeed, although Article V of the New York Convention 1958 creates a presumption that the foreign Court will respect a decision of the Court of the seat of an Award, the word “may” implies that there is no compulsion to do so. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 5:51 am
In an amicus brief filed on Apr. 8, 2025 in Perkins Coie LLP v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
In Wheaton v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am
In Dalgleish v Dalgleish, [2001] O.J. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 4:57 pm
A PRIMER on International Arbitration for Board MEMBERS & Local COunsel Arbitration is not a new concept, in fact it has been used for centuries, with Plato writing about arbitration amongst the ancient Greeks. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am
The advent of rideshare services has revolutionized urban transportation, offering convenience and flexibility to millions of users. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:09 am
The advent of rideshare services has revolutionized urban transportation, offering convenience and flexibility to millions of users. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
KEYNOTE Introduced by Michael Carroll, Professor of Law and Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law Justin Hughes, Senior Advisor to the Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Head of United States Delegation to the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Professor of Law at Yeshiva University Cardozo School of Law In Geneva, working on GRTKF: Genetic resources, traditional knowledge, and… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
We felt safe because we were in Mi’kmaw territory, and Donald was protected by his treaty rights, affirmed and recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1985 in Simon v The Queen and section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Dowd litigated Bakalar v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am
[v] But, to contrary appearances, on February 27, 2020, the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) released its Priority Planning Committee’s Strategic Plan (LSO’s Treasurer (“President” in other provinces), Malcolm Mercer, being the Chair of the Committee). [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
For the reasons outlined above in my analysis of Grant v Todorovic (supra) I do not feel that this is such a case. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
(Oxford University Press, 2008), page 2] In Canada, the prohibition against lawyers being employed to provide services to the customers of their employers[ii] can be overcome by a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms “public freedom for access to the courts” argument based upon s. 2(b)’s, “freedom of opinion and expression”; see: Re Southam Inc. and The Queen (No. 1), 1983 CanLII 1707 (ONCA), 41 O.R. (2d) 113; plus an extended use of, Endean v. [read post]