Search for: "Qui Tam" Results 3961 - 3980 of 4,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 10:09 pm
Fortunately, the False Claims Act has a qui tam provision that lets private citizens not only file a whistleblower lawsuit but also allows them to get a percentage of what the government recovers. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Ginger Buck
Like the majority of False Claims Act cases, this one was originated by a whistleblower under the qui tam provisions of the statute which allow private parties to bring lawsuits on behalf of the government against those committing fraud against the government. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 5:29 pm by LTA-Editor
Critics of this approach point out that that these compliance deficiencies are better suited to breach of contract claims and that expanding liability will feed the current proliferation of qui tam FCA filings. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 11:45 am by Sadie Mayhew
As FBI Houston Special Agent in Charge Douglas Williams noted, “We applaud the qui tam whistleblower who exposed this scheme and encourage others to report illegal medical practices. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:53 am by Eric
Patent false marking qui tam process is unconstitutional [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:29 am
The qui tam provision of the False Claims Act is one of the government's greatest weapons in detecting fraud. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:53 pm by Ben Vernia
* * * The case apparently arose from a government investigation, rather than from a whistleblower’s qui tam suit. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:25 am by Ben Vernia
* * * The case apparently arose from a government investigation, and not from a whistleblower’s qui tam complaint. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:23 pm
  The government, and the qui tam whistleblowers who help the government fight fraud, have some new arrows in their quiver. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:03 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Every lawyer who does qui tam cases wants the government to help move the case along, but let's be honest: the USAO is overwhelmed with work. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:41 am by fraudfighters
Although the Court’s broad reading of the public disclosure bar in Schindler Elevator is damaging for whistleblowers who seek to bring well-supported FCA qui tam claims, it is possible that Congressional action will limit, or nullify, the Court’s decision. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 1:11 pm by Sadie Mayhew
They also were all originated by whistleblowers under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, which allow private persons to bring lawsuits on behalf of the government against those that defraud the government. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:27 am by Nolan and Auerbach
For more information about qui tam law and health care fraud, contact Nolan & Auerbach, P.A. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:00 am by Chip Merlin
" The story is not quite complete because a qui tam case involving State Farm catastrophe claims adjusters is set for trial in December. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:50 pm by Fraud Fighters
” If you believe that you may have information about a company committing fraud against the government, the Qui Tam Attorneys at Tycko & Zavareei are readily available to assist in bringing forward a case. [read post]
The 2015 qui tam complaint at the heart of this matter asserted that, in exchange for “lavish hunting, fishing and golf trips, private plane flights, frequent-flyer miles and other items of value,” ophthalmologists used products supplied by Precision Lens in various ophthalmology procedures. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:52 pm by Jim Higgins
The lawsuit was pursued by the DOJ after two relators (qui tam whistleblowers), Bernard Lisitza and David Kammerer, both former Omnicare employees, reported the kickbacks. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Sadie Mayhew
”  Like most False Claims Act cases, this one was initiated by a whistleblower under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act which authorize private parties to bring these cases on the government’s behalf. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:57 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
The MSP is not a qui tam statute, and therefore the only person with standing is the injured Medicare beneficiary, and the recovery only applies to expenses already incurred by Medicare. [read post]