Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 3961 - 3980 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:15 am by Howard Wasserman
But “[t]he Senators and Representatives . . . , and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support [the] Constitution. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am by Amy Howe
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen covers yesterday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm by Ronald Mann
” As Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized repeatedly during the argument, the clause reflects the concern of the Constitution’s drafters with “accountability” – the idea that some readily identifiable official could be held accountable for the selection of any “officer” of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving threats made on social media. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:16 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    The case is Schindler Elevator Corp. v United States, 10-188. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
  She was appointed by the Court to make those arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 8:07 am
Ashby, No. 08-0770/MC, and United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:48 am by John Floyd
United States, decided on January 25, 2015, is also “the law of the land. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Tongue in cheek, Roberts quoted a 1985 law review article criticizing Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:03 pm by Mark Graber
University of Texas at Austin, permanently enjoined the enforcement of Obama administration immigration policies in United States v. [read post]