Search for: "Robert Small"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 7,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 9:21 am
Robert A. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor have not read any, while in the past ten Terms Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Kagan have read only one each. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Dorf, a Justia columnist, is the Robert S. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
Tonight, as the clock strikes midnight, it is with not a little sadness that we say farewell to our three guest Kats for the first half of 2013: Stefano Barazza (who will be joining the team of authors of the PatLit weblog), Jeff John Roberts and Matthias Lamping. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
That the law itself remains intact is no small victory. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
John Marsh, Peter Toren, Ken Vanko and Seyfarth’s Robert Milligan), have come out in support of creating a civil claim in federal court for trade secret theft in some form. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
John Marsh, Peter Toren, Ken Vanko and Seyfarth’s Robert Milligan), have come out in support of creating a civil claim in federal court for trade secret theft in some form. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 7:25 am
The Roberts Court2 has released between 65 (OT11) and 75 (OT10) opinions after oral argument every Term. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
.June 28, 2013 I launched this blog around 2008. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Waiver: When it’s ambiguous whether a claim has been disposed by summary judgment JUSTIN CURTIS NALL, ROBERT W. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
And the conclusion of Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
The key move in Hollingsworth, per Roberts with the votes of Scalia and (perhaps unfortunately?) [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
In the first paragraph of his opinion for the Court, Chief Justice Roberts identifies two problems with the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5’s preclearance requirement is “a drastic departure from basic principles of federalism,” and Section 4’s coverage formula is “an equally dramatic departure from the principle that all States enjoy equal sovereignty. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm
With that ruling, the conservative majority — Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Alito, Kennedy, Scalia and Thomas — has left many victims of workplace harassment without legal recourse.No victims of workplace harassment are without legal recourse. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:50 pm
Robert Hurt (R-VA) and Rep. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:55 am
The following article published in USA Today, reports of tens of thousands of unnecessary surgeries every year. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:36 am
A small price to pay to assure freedom for millions. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 5:14 pm
Assistant United States Attorney Robert D. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Kennedy, and Thomas joined in the majority opinion. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
The owner of a small restaurant (Italian Colors) thinks that American Express (Amex) has used its monopoly power to force merchants to accept a form contract violating the antitrust laws. [read post]
