Search for: "STATE FARM INSURANCE" Results 3961 - 3980 of 5,613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm by Walter Olson
Tags: bloggers and the law, Dickie Scruggs, Katrina, legal blogs, State Farm, whistleblowers Related posts State Farm withdraws from Mississippi (9) Scruggs indictment, days 3-4 (3) Scruggs indictment, day two (7) June 21 roundup (5) “Not about the money” files: Dickie Scruggs edition (1) [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:37 am by structuredsettlements
A number of current and former structured settlement annuity issuers have made the 2010 Wards 50® of Top Performing Life Insurers: Aetna Life Insurance Company Amica Life Insurance Company*  American Family Life Insurance Company* Metropolitan Life Insurance Company New York Life Insurance Company Symetra Life Insurance Company State Farm Life* USAA Life Insurance Company* While a portion can… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:07 pm by David T. S. Fraser
State Farm challenged this decision by bringing an application for judicial review in the Federal Court of Canada. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:51 pm by nyinjuries
Marshall’s mother had primary insurance with State Farm, and excess with Metropolitan Insurance Company. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:49 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm, a brother against brother (insurance company v. insurance company) squabble that may change permissive use law in Maryland (hopefully the CoA grants cert). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:49 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm, a brother against brother (insurance company v. insurance company) squabble that may change permissive use law in Maryland (hopefully the CoA grants cert). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:01 am by David Rossmiller
  I'm sure in person she is a perfectly pleasant professional and I wish instead of kvetching about me and assuming I was some hireling living off State Farm's payroll she would have called me up to give me her point of view, and if she asked I would have been happy to tell her why I was doing what I was doing: I found the Katrina story to be fascinating human drama and it became a hobby to blog about it. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:15 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
I couldn't care less whether Agency or State Farm pays on the first claim. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:15 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
I couldn't care less whether Agency or State Farm pays on the first claim. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as plaintiffs elected to accept the settlement without asserting their current claim that they were entitled to an additional amount representing the architectural and engineering fees, the settlement gave rise to an accord and satisfaction (see Gimper, Inc. v Giacchetta, 221 AD2d 682, 684 [1995]; Hemingway v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm by Harry Styron
In many Ozarks counties, state and local government jobs are just about the only jobs with health insurance and retirement programs. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:23 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
State Farm, 589 F.Supp. 559 (M.D.Pa. 2008).Reviewing the Plaintiff's allegations in this matter, Judge Munley determined that the bad faith allegations were preempted by section 1797 because the dispute over the findings of the IME doctor revolved around a dispute over whether the Plaintiff's treatment was reasonable or necesary. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:43 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Swinehart and State Farm, No. 375-10 CV (June 3, 2010, Williamson, P.J.) in which he denied both the UIM carrier’s Motion to Sever the Plaintiff’s bad faith claim and the request that the bad faith claim be stayed pending the resolution of the underinsured motorist action. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:01 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Global reinsurance Corporation of America Regal_Constr_v__Nat__Union Shaw_v__State_Farm Skinner v Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Smith_v__Hampshire Sparks_v__Citizens_Ins State Farm v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:16 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Co., 371 A.2d 193 (Pa. 1977) in which the Court held that, in order to deny uninsured motorist benefits, a carrier must establish prejudice resulting from the insured’s failure to provide notice.The Supreme Court chose not to follow its more recent opinion in the case of State Farm Ins. [read post]