Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 3961 - 3980 of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2007, 12:56 pm
However, this Court generally refers to state-law tolling rules, e.g., Hardin v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those people--like the… [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Precisely that situation took place this past Monday when the United States Supreme Court overruled Harris v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:08 am
The complaint asserts, inter alia, violations of the Lanham Act and unfair competition: • Count I: Trademark Infringement• Count II: False Designation of Origin• Count III: Unfair Competition• Count IV: Forgery• Count V: Corrective Advertising Damages• Count VI: Declaratory Judgment• Count VII: Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief Trademark counsel for Ambre Blends seeks a… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 6:41 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Last week, the Sixth Circuit, on the government's motion, published the previously unpublished decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:57 am
Thereafter, appellant represented himself at trial before a different judge, and a jury convicted him of both counts. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm by John Jascob
NexPoint seeks injunctions requiring the defendants to count votes cast for nominees put forward by NexPoint and to issue additional proxy materials retracting misleading statements and making accurate disclosures (NexPoint Advisors, L.P. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
§ 1125(c) Count V: Trademark Dilution under I.C. 24-2-1-13.5 Count VII [sic]: Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief Count VIII: Corrective Advertising Damages Plaintiff asks the court for injunctive relief, costs and attorneys’ fees. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:18 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
§ 1125(c) Count V: Trademark Dilution under I.C. 24-2-1-13.5 Count VII [sic]: Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief Count VIII: Corrective Advertising Damages Plaintiff asks the court for injunctive relief, costs and attorneys’ fees. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 1:45 pm by The Health Law Partners
State Farm ruling would have on their right to receive insurance payments for undisputed services, the University of Michigan Regents v. [read post]