Search for: "Samsung"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 6,706
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
If you have been following the saga of the Samsung v Apple patent litigation in England and Wales, which has been stayed so that Samsung can apply to the European Patent Office to have its patents amended (see earlier Katpost here), there's a small but significant sequel, noted on PatLit here. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:28 am
While Apple is seeking north of $1 billion in damages from Samsung in the ongoing jury re-retrial in the Northern District of California, its earth-spanning dispute with Qualcomm continued today in the Munich I Regional Court with a first hearing (the primary objective of which is roughly comparable to that of a Markman hearing in a U.S. patent infringement case). [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 11:15 am
Customs recently settled the issue, at least with respect to a Samsung "Gear" Live Android smartwatch. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:28 am
Samsung, and notes the following:"Here, Apple invites this Court to inject itself into an ongoing proceeding in Colombia. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:00 am
Samsung, reiterated my longstanding position on coerced FRAND arbitration.I don't know what exactly caused Chairman Simons's recusal. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:03 am
" The author acknowledges that applying for registrations through the Hague System has become more complex, but argues this is a "small price to pay" for single pass access to protection in over 80 countries.Design Law in the Apple vs Samsung Dispute: Lessons and Prospects (David Stone) This helpful case note comes from a partner in the intellectual property department at Simmons & Simmons. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:44 am
In the case of RCD 0002 (which was the first dealt with in the judgement), Judge Birss accepted the defendant’s argument that the dashed lines indicated that the front panel was transparent (again highly reminiscent of Apple / Samsung). [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:27 pm
Samsung design patent matter. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
Samsung trial. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:58 pm
Samsung is practically Apple v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:57 pm
(FOSS Patents coverage)September 28, 2011: Microsoft and Samsung Broaden Smartphone Partnership ("Under the terms of the agreement, Microsoft will receive royalties for Samsung's mobile phones and tablets running the Android mobile platform.") [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 12:30 am
Obviously, Apple and Samsung are still among the most-sued companies in the world, because they're so big, rich, and famous. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 8:39 am
As an owner of Samsung devices for a long time (even before I migrated from an iPhone to a Google Pixel), I could also have decided to activate Google Pay or Samsung Pay, but then I'd have had to carry two devices with me: a major inconvenience in many situations.Still, there are more than a billion iPhone users in the world, and they're presumably a subset of the world's richest 1.2 or so billion people. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:59 pm
Samsung II trial in the Northern District of California, Apple's lawyers try hard to downplay Google's role, though it's blindingly obvious that Google is the true target of Apple's second California lawsuit against Samsung. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
And just like before, Qualcomm stressed that it primarily wanted the additional material to be considered with a view to the prospective respective that is injunctive relief.Qualcomm argues that injunctive relief is no longer warranted because, according to testimony it elicited, the big three device makers that use premium LTE chips--Samsung, Apple, Huawei--either buy them from Intel (Apple) or build a high percentage of them internally (Huawei has HiSilicon, Samsung has Exynos). [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:25 am
On this point, Kitchin LJ relied upon Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 12:59 am
§ 154(b))Samsung submitted that the 4 patents were invalid for obviousness-type double patenting over another patent in the same family. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:29 pm
And that would be much worse than the Ericsson-Samsung dispute because there wouldn't even be two wrongs (that don't make a right anyway) but there would be only one wrong, and only one party that is unfairly harmed on the basis of SEPs. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:07 pm
(FOSS Patents coverage)September 28, 2011: Microsoft and Samsung Broaden Smartphone Partnership ("Under the terms of the agreement, Microsoft will receive royalties for Samsung's mobile phones and tablets running the Android mobile platform.") [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 12:21 am
(FOSS Patents coverage)September 28, 2011: Microsoft and Samsung Broaden Smartphone Partnership ("Under the terms of the agreement, Microsoft will receive royalties for Samsung's mobile phones and tablets running the Android mobile platform.") [read post]
