Search for: "Samsung" Results 3961 - 3980 of 6,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2013, 10:44 am by Shouvik Kumar Guha
The Delhi High Court’s order endorsing the concept of international exhaustion under the trademark law had been appealed against by Samsung at the Supreme Court, which formed the subject of the next post by Shamnad, wherein he also provided a succinct explanation of the concept of exhaustion itself. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:21 am by Sean Hayes
At my office near Samsung’s office we, regularly, hear the chants from protestors. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:19 am by Florian Mueller
In cases in which two operating companies are suing each other over patents, the "defensive use" clause in the FTC's proposed patent agreement with Google is a huge problem.In the particular case of InterDigital's complaint, Samsung has also raised an issue that could delay institution of an investigation, but Samsung's insistence on compliance with the ITC's factual pleading standard would likely result in a delay of only a few months, while the FRAND determination in federal… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:08 am
Naturally, Judge Birss confessed, he was unaware of this relatively esoteric case when rendering his judgment in Apple v Samsung, and it’s likely an instance of multiple discovery. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:54 am by TIMDWGCD48013
And even if you are, somewhere there is a looming Samsung to your Apple. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:54 am by TIMDWGCD48013
And even if you are, somewhere there is a looming Samsung to your Apple. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:54 am by John Wallbillich
And even if you are, somewhere there is a looming Samsung to your Apple. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:54 am by TIMDWGCD48013
And even if you are, somewhere there is a looming Samsung to your Apple. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:13 am by Docket Navigator
Following an evidentiary hearing, the ALJ found that Samsung infringed one of Apple’s phone design patents, and rejected Samsung’s argument that Apple was required to show "deceptive similarity." [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
I have yet to see a case involving such major players that the ITC would decline to investigate.The ITC is already investigating Ericsson's earlier-filed complaint against Samsung. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:40 am by Swaraj Paul Barooah
So when Samsung Electronics emerged with the biggest portfolio of graphene patents held by any R&D unit, it was not much of a surprise. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
., held 3, Research in Motion Limited held 3 and the others, such as, Samsung, AIIMS, Saint-Gobain, Fujiflims, Honeywell, Bayer, BP Chemicals Limite A British Company, The Secretary, Ministry Of Information, Technology, The Trustees Of Princeton University, PPG Industries Ohio,Inc. and Honda Motors held one patent each. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:35 am by Joe Mullin
While Apple may get a nice check from Samsung at the end of the day, it also wants to kick certain Samsung products out of the US market. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:38 pm by Florian Mueller
That's why Samsung would not be able to make this same argument in a U.S. court. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Based on the initial ruling, Samsung would be able to sell products in the United States that steer clear of infringement of any of the patents Samsung was deemed to have infringed, but the impact of such designarounds on the usability of Samsung's products is unknown. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
(Korea), Samsung Electronics Benelux BV, Samsung Electronics Logistics Europe BV, Samsung Electronics Overseas BV) differed from those involved in the UK case (Samsung Electronics UK Ltd.), albeit being part of the same group (SEC). [read post]