Search for: "Samuels" Results 3961 - 3980 of 14,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 6:37 pm by Howard Bashman
“SCOTUS stays discovery in sweeping antitrust MDL v. generic drugmakers”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post about an order that Justice Samuel A. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 8:28 am by David Pozen
Samuel Bray and Paul Miller have posted a new paper that critiques a growing body of scholarship that argues that the Constitution imposes fiduciary duties on various actors, including the President. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:30 am by Sam F. Halabi
Supreme Court, instead of (U.S. citizen) Samuel Alito, when popular criticism of citation of foreign law was at a fever pitch in the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Even though Justice Samuel Alito cast the deciding vote to reject the nondelegation challenge in Gundy, he noted that, “if a majority of this Court were willing to reconsider the approach we have taken for the past 84 years, I would support that effort. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 6:03 am by Elliot Setzer
Samuel Rebo discussed the prospects for extending the New START arms control treaty with Russia. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:04 pm by Uthman Law Office
F076022) 2020 WL 830758 The Court of Appeal reversed Samuel Medellin’s convictions for assault with force likely to cause great bodily injury, and their accompanying enhancements for inflicting great bodily injury. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 10:58 am by Elliot Setzer
Samuel Rebo discussed the prospects for extending the New START arms control treaty with Russia. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, filed a brief concurring opinion expressing their belief that the Puerto Rico Supreme Court’s decision not only rested on faulty jurisdiction, but also was wrong on the merits. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am by Margo Schlanger
Justice Samuel Alito had an additional response. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:42 pm by Natalya Shnitser
” In a unanimous decision written by Justice Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court agreed, holding that a plaintiff does not necessarily have actual knowledge of the information contained in disclosures that he receives but does not read or cannot recall reading. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:37 pm by Leah Litman
The justices also echoed a frustration that Justice Samuel Alito had expressed at argument – namely, that contrary to Shular’s representations, the Florida drug laws under which Shular was convicted did have a criminal intent element. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:43 pm by Rory Little
Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion for the court was unanimous, although Justice Samuel Alito concurred separately (joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch) to opine briefly on three related issues that the court emphasized it was “not deciding. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:55 am by Amy Howe
The court’s four more conservative justices – Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – all indicated that they would have denied the challengers’ application and allowed Louisiana to enforce the admitting-privileges requirement. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:07 am by Jon Brodkin
(credit: Samuel Axon) Apple does not let filmmakers show villains using iPhones on camera, movie director Rian Johnson said in a new interview with Vanity Fair. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:51 am by Samuel Bray
Yesterday the Senate Committee on the Judiciary held a hearing about national (a.k.a. nationwide or universal) injunctions. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am by Gabriel Chin
” Justice Samuel Alito picked up this point in Mark Fleming’s argument for Sineneng-Smith. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At Fox News, Ronn Blitzer and Bill Mears report that the court held that “precedent regarding lawsuits against officers, known as ‘Bivens claims,’ does not apply to cross-border shootings’: [Justice Samuel] Alito noted the high standard of extending Bivens to a ‘new context’ and gave several reasons why it was inappropriate in this case. [read post]