Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 10,137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who argued on behalf of the United States as a “friend of the court” supporting Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only abortion clinic in Mississippi. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Montana Supreme Court explicitly rejected Citizens United and refused to invalidate this state law. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:01 am
Thus, for instance, in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
" In Gallardo v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Fulton v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:11 am
To the relief of employers, Browning-Ferris quickly appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
Illegal immigrant brought to the United States in 2000, when he was three years old, is arrested by ICE and released on bond while his immigration proceedings move forward. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
The effects have been profound, especially with respect to the role of states, and especially of the United States as its long time position in global affairs undergoes significant change. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
A final thought: at least since 1978 (Klass v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm
Misrepresentation in the REDMA is defined as (a) a false or misleading statement of a material fact, or (b) an omission to state a material fact. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm
Misrepresentation in the REDMA is defined as (a) a false or misleading statement of a material fact, or (b) an omission to state a material fact. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Raulin v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen Case C-357/89 states that duration of work is a finding of fact, but also supports taking the previous wok history into account. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 9:34 am
The lawsuit, Jensen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:57 pm
In short, Section 103 of the US Patent Act states that a patent cannot be granted for an invention that would have been "obvious" to a hypothetical "person having ordinary skill in the art". [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:06 am
See McDonald v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm
In Simmons v. [read post]
