Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2007, 5:03 am
He currently leads a court that has turned the formerly mild John Paul Stevens into the great dissenter.The Court's decision in Bowles v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
While the Court supports its ruling with over 50 pages of factual findings, its holding was essentially a foregone conclusion once the Court determined that it agreed with the reasoning of VFB LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 7:23 pm
Personally, I don't see the Court of Appeals reconsidering the underlying rationale of Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v Maryland Cas. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:59 pm
Today I learned that on 15 August 2007, the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals -- are you sitting down? [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:27 am
[ILB - the case is State of Indiana v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:26 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:33 am
The Court, citing the United States Supreme Court precedent of Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
Jan appealed to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 2:58 am
While I have dealt with that subject before (see: How New York Caps Personal Injury Damages), New York's Court of Appeals will re-visit today the issue in one of the saddest cases ever brought. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
" Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
regarding the efforts to reverse, by legislation, the Court of Appeals Decision in Walling v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Giannicos v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:16 am
Woo's boorish behavior to make the decision seem more palatable (additional facts are contained in the prior, reversed decision by the Court of Appeals, Division I). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted review in Meyer v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 10:05 am
I would therefore affirm Bennett's convictions and I concur in the result.In The State of Indiana, Morgan County Office of the Department of Child Services v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
The state trial court concurred, and Getsy received no relief either on direct appeal or in state postconviction proceedings. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:55 pm
Given what I thought were some particularly empty arguments in the briefs by the State, as opposed to those raised by Public Citizen on behalf of itself and an upstate law firm, I find this surprising.In a squib in today's New York Law Journal:Court System Seeks to Appeal Ruling Faulting Some Ad RulesThe state will appeal a federal judge's ruling that some new attorney advertising rules violate lawyers' free speech rights. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
:I wanted to update you on a recent court decision relating to the rules on lawyer advertising recently adopted by the Appellate Divisions.In Alexander v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
