Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
The case is styled, Hodges v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Emily Phelps recounts the testimony of North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick at last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a proposed constitutional amendment on campaign finance reform in light of the Chief Justice’s comments on donor influence in McCutcheon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Another reminder of the oft-repeated rule that only a rights holder may sue to defend those rights, and associations that claim to represent rights holders but do not own any rights are not proper plaintiffs. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:32 pm
’s ban on handguns (Heller v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am
Even under Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 10:28 pm
Holder, 130 S. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
The recent jury verdict in the Zwerner case in Miami, Florida (U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
" Mota v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
In the case of Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others, case C‑360/13,The Court of Justice of the European Union has held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, with PRCA director general Francis Ingham saying: "We are utterly delighted that the CJEU has accepted all of our arguments against the NLA". [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
Not only is the Court just about to rule in in Case C-360/13 Public Relations Consultants Association v Newspaper Licensing Agency, but Advocate General (AG) Jääskinen has just released his Opinion [not yet available] in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
It would be possible to design browsing software without an internet cache, but in the present state of technology the result would be that the internet would be unable to cope with current volumes of traffic and would not function properly. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:01 am
The Court’s unanimous opinion in Limelight Networks v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
From Renna v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:55 am
In Limelight Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Phelps), and false claims to possess the Medal of Honor (United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
On May 19, the Supreme Court decided Petrella v. [read post]
