Search for: "State v. Liberator"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 7,773
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2015, 12:49 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:11 am
Reading the Second Circuit’s affirmance of District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s suppression ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 2:13 pm
The State Legislature in liberalizing the statutes to effect greater protection to the victims of domestic violence by enactment of L.1980, c. 530, is deemed cognizant that Family Court is a non-jury institution wherein the court sits as both finder of fact and of law. [read post]
25 May 2015, 2:13 pm
The State Legislature in liberalizing the statutes to effect greater protection to the victims of domestic violence by enactment of L.1980, c. 530, is deemed cognizant that Family Court is a non-jury institution wherein the court sits as both finder of fact and of law. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am
’ ”Even in England, a relatively liberal jurisdiction in this regard, some requirements of form remain. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm
Ever since Rodriguez v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 5:39 am
In the case of Tribuzio v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
United States, Debs v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:50 am
Lilian del Castillo (Univ. of Buenos Aires - Law) has published Law of the Sea, From Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Liber Amicorum Judge Hugo Caminos (Brill | Nijhoff 2015). [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:15 am
The decision is also overwhelmingly endorsed by left-of-center federal judges (though some liberal state judges differ), and by many government officials and urban planners. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:48 pm
The case, Radiance Foundation v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:35 am
Relying primarily on Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
This issue did not need to be decided upon in CG v Facebook Ireland because the DPA was found not to apply. [read post]
14 May 2015, 5:56 pm
Concluding the study which resulted in this recommendation, the Council stated: 'Finally, because it is desirable for motions to be determined after both parties have had a full opportunity to sustain their respective positions, the recommended amendments adopt the liberal practice of the Fourth Department.' While no legislation has resulted from this recommendation, this court agrees with the views of the Judicial Council and with the results reached in the Third and… [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:55 am
As the Second Circuit said in the landmark 1984 FISA case, United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:33 am
Daniels v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:15 am
The case, Garmin International v. [read post]
