Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 11,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
As Professors Elizabeth Rowe and Daniel Mahfood explained in their pre-DTSA article, there were two main challenges when it came to using state trade secret law to reach out-of-state conduct. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 3:24 am
In Josephson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
First, neither of the main arguments of the plurality appear to have much traction. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Stated otherwise, if the plaintiff-client cannot prove that it would have prevailed in the underlying action, the defendant-attorney's negligence was not a proximate cause of any damages arising from the loss of the same. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
The table below chronicles the main events during the failed negotiation phase. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:39 am
That’s highlighted by a recent case I mentioned, Robbins v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:56 am
(h/t: Wisconsin Law Journal) This new unpublished opinion, State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 8:47 am
Let's take a look.In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 10:16 pm
United States, Gall v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 12:40 pm
In the case of Peggy Young v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
Cochrane [1993] Crim LR 98, which was applied in Ireland in relation to mobile phone records by People (DPP) v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In the case of Hamari v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:16 am
Luckily, the CJEU was poised to answer this question in a case that was decided last month.The case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb GmbH v Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co KG concerned the sale of medical dressings made by Lohmann, sold under the brand "Debrisoft" (TM No. 8852279). [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:45 am
The Supreme Court has not rendered an opinion on felon disenfranchisement for a very long time, but Justice O'Connor has.Yesterday, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued this opinion in the Arizona case of Harvey v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:45 am
The Supreme Court has not rendered an opinion on felon disenfranchisement for a very long time, but Justice O'Connor has.Yesterday, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued this opinion in the Arizona case of Harvey v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:50 pm
Another example of a court order that first approved a transfer of structured settlement payment rights, and later was declared ineffective, comes from the opinion of the United States District Court in Maryland, in a case captioned Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
In the case H.F. and Others v. [read post]
