Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 3961 - 3980 of 4,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
 If  the era's landmark statutes and super-precedents can plausibly serve as ammunition for both progressive and conservative lawyers in their efforts to convince decision-makers, their on-going appeals to these materials will increasingly transform them   into a source of  “neutral principles” for further doctrinal development. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
  Those Progressives saw the administrative state as the sword of social justice, particularly in the New Deal era. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
The State has attempted to take redevelopment agencies funds in each of the last two budget cycles. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:33 pm
In a 1991 case called R. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm by Bona Law PC
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:10 am by SHG
• Policy-makers adopt the ABA Criminal Justice Standards on the Treatment of Prisoners. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Specifically, the proposed section 15125(a)(2) states in relevant part that “[a] lead agency may use … a historic conditions baseline … as the sole baseline for analysis only if it demonstrates with substantial evidence that use of existing conditions would be either misleading or without informative value to decision-makers and the public[.] [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
”  The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:22 am by Hutko
Its content is nothing but a shameful statement of where a lobbying muscle of the music industry can drag our policy makers. [read post]