Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 3961 - 3980 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Zalman Rothschild, Fulton’s Missing Question: Religious Adoption Agencies and the Establishment Clause, (Texas Law Review Online, Vol. 100 (2021)).Marc Spindelman, The Shower's Return: An Essay on the LGBT Title VII Sex Discrimination Cases, 82 Ohio State Law Journal Online 128 (2021).Marc Spindelman, Mississippi's Originalism: Dobbs v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 12:10 pm
A couple recent articles from Law.com:'These Schools of Interpretation Are Folderol': State Chief Justices Discuss How They Analyze the LawHow appellate analytics give law firms a competitive edgeCLA's recent video program on the famous Mendez v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:40 am
As I previously stated, I am not looking forward to this program. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by Howard Bashman
Wade; State’s law banning procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy presents direct challenge to 1973 precedent. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm by ernst
It also marked a major shift in the Court’s response to President Franklin D. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 5:24 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Wilkinson, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2733 (11 December 2009) Josephs, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2800 (17 December 2009) Sheppard & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 65 (29 January 2010) C & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 72 (29 January 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Akzo Nobel UK Ltd v Arista Tubes Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 28 (29 January 2010) Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Mark Alemo-Herron & 23 Ors [2010] EWCA… [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Majekolagbe, Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 5:22 pm by Howard Friedman
As has been widely reported (CNN), the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals early today in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]