Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 3961 - 3980 of 20,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2007, 6:05 am
Casey, I find almost nothing to cheer about in the Court's decision last week in Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:14 pm by B.W. Barnett
Well I was hoping that the Supreme Court might take the opportunity in Briscoe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:15 am by Michael Posluns
Canada when Justice Phelan handed down his decision in the Federal Court under the title “Chicken Little v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 9:50 am
The Court finds plain error because the notice was not filed with the district court, but was merely faxed to defense counsel. ----- Note: I'm still in the jury pool so I'm still not looking at newspapers. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
   One such decision was that in Mimo Connect v Buley & Ors, which ended up in the Court of Appeal a month ago with the decision of Lord Justice Bean (giving Judgment of the Court) handed down two weeks ago ([2023] EWCA Civ 909).BackgroundAs she said in the last post, trade secrets cases are full of facts, so buckle in. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on the DACA order, noting that the court “simply allowed the case to run its normal course through the appeals court, which it asked to ‘proceed expeditiously,” and that “[t]he case still could come to the high court in the future. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm by The Editors
By Andrea Finuccio For the last 17 years, the Abolitionist Action Committee has been holding a four-day fast and vigil outside of the Supreme Court from June 29-July 2, and it is aptly named “Starvin’ for Justice. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:40 am by Josh Blackman
” Two centuries after his death, Chief Justice John Marshall still presides over the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Hellerstedt, gives the justices a chance “to demonstrate that long-standing precedent still matters before today’s Court – and that the real lives of real women still matter under the law. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am by Steven Calabresi
I pointed out that all nine justices, themselves, must ask the lawyers who argue both sides of Trump v. [read post]
Mr Kumarasamy’s appeal was therefore brought before the Supreme Court and heard before a panel of five Supreme Court Justices. [read post]