Search for: "Towne v. Towne" Results 3961 - 3980 of 8,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2021, Oxford County Court handed down judgment in Fairhurst v Woodard (Case No: G00MK161). [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 1:03 am by CMS
   The case of TW Logistics Ltd v Essex County Council and Anor concerns the question of whether a piece of land owned by TWL forming part of the Port of Mistley in Essex (the “Land”) was properly registered as a Town or Village Green (“TVG”) in terms of the Commons Act 2006, s 12 (the “2006 Act”). [read post]
The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it has granted certiorari in the case City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:31 am
And in Bentley Estate v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
Writ of prohibition not available to bar an executive action such as conducting an investigationMatter of Doe v Cuomo, 2010 NY Slip Op 02143, Decided on March 16, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department“John Doe” initiated a CPLR Article 78 action seeking a writ of prohibition* to bar NYS Attorney General Andrew M. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These claims are based on statements that Devine made on the record during a court proceeding in the Waterford Town Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:07 am
Imposing a disciplinary penaltyToth v Nassau County PD, App. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
Each town, each village, each school district, each special district and each authority are separate layoff units. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by Laura Sandwell
The appellant applied to register a playing field acquired in 1951 as a site for the erection of council houses as a town/village green under the Commons Act 2006, s 15(2). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
They criticised the corporates in books, radio interviews and, in the case of two of the attorneys, presenting a lecture at the Summer School at University of Cape Town. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
""Nonetheless," said the court, "we are constrained by the Court of Appeals' decisions in Matter of Waldren v Town of Islip (6 NY3d 735), and Pell v Board (34 NY2d 222) not to disturb the UFSD's determination, as it cannot be said as a matter of law that the penalty imposed on the petitioner herein, termination, is ‘so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of… [read post]