Search for: "United States v. Cooper"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 4,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2009, 8:01 am
Ct. 2382, 2386 (1991); see also United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:15 am
1st_Circuit_seal.png In a pyramid scheme case, the First Circuit affirms the limitation of defense cross-examination of a prosecution witness about the nature of the charges against the witness currently pending in state court; trial judge properly allowed defense to raise only the probative aspect of the extrinsic evidence (about the possible motivation of the witness to ingratiate himself with the government by cooperating in the pyramid scheme prosecution),… [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:30 am
Anonymous v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
", are treated as part of the name, if there are variant spellings of a person's name, choose the form found in the first resource received (cataloged), for compound surnames, refer to IFLA's "Names of persons…" Abbreviations will be replaced by fully spelled out words and phrases: v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 9:30 pm
See Miller, 335 F.3d at 899; United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:51 am
The Arizona Supreme Court noted, however, that “[t]he United States Supreme Court ultimately rejected the federal death knell doctrine in Coopers & Lybrand v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:25 pm
Back in 1985 the United Kingdom and Ireland made an agreement to cooperate to reconcile the two communities in Northern Ireland. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:46 am
McDonough et al. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:30 pm
This creates an Establishment Clause problem.The case is Cooper v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:06 pm
Dale, Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Concord, MA; Eugene Bernat, President) Bay State Animal Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
: Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group & Ors (PatLit) Nude trademark battle between Stella McCartney and Nude Skincare heads for Chancery Division (IPKat) NZ tribes find Everton Football Club’s misappropriation of Haka culturally insensitive (1709 Copyright Blog) Pirate Party UK officially registered (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) Save £10 on your patenting costs - Trade Marks and Trade Marks and Patents (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2009 (IPKat) Patents County Court:… [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:48 am
Our recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:22 am
Compared with the dry, mannerly prose found in many opinions, Judge Fletcher's passion in Cooper v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:20 am
Compared with the dry, mannerly prose found in many opinions, Judge Fletcher's passion in Cooper v. [read post]
