Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 3961 - 3980 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2009, 11:17 pm
Cal.; Aug. 3, 2009)] [link to opinion at Scribd].In October 2008 it was widely reported that the United States seized the "Mongols" trademark. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 6:58 pm
It found:“The Pet Silk® mark has been registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the last 10 years and has been in use for the last 15 years at least. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 2:50 pm by JB
  The public policy in this case is the public's right to know about the private life of the President of the United States before he became President. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thereafter, the plaintiff, pro se, commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (hereinafter the District Court) against the United States, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
It might be assumed that an extension of the copyright term in the TPP wouldn't affect the United States, because our law already provides for that same copyright term. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc, heard 25 – 26 November 2013. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Today's appeal, in Case T-50/09 Ifemy’s Holding GmbH v OHIM, Dada & Co. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:38 am by SHG
The justices of the United States Supreme Court are at their best when united against a common foe. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 8-1 that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]