Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 3961 - 3980 of 9,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
United States, which discussed reasons for a less strict adherence to the court’s past decisions, as an example of a theory deserving of addition scholarly and legal scrutiny. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Following Goldsmith was Thomas Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae supporting the petitioners. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:41 am by Sam Williams
Among other things, these regulations state that the decision to terminate special counsel must come from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, since Attorney General Jeff Sessions has chosen to recuse himself from this case, and that the termination must be for cause.In response to the recent discussion of firing Robert Mueller as special counsel, the United States Senate has produced two proposed legislative responses to protect the special counsel. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am by Travis Casey
However, in the last fifty years, the United States has removed those values of relying on one’s self and neighbors. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1928), foregrounded a right to privacy, an idea that would only later become a core part of liberalism, with Supreme Court decisions such as Griswold v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:15 am by Howard Wasserman
But “[t]he Senators and Representatives . . . , and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support [the] Constitution. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am by Amy Howe
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen covers yesterday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm by Ronald Mann
” As Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized repeatedly during the argument, the clause reflects the concern of the Constitution’s drafters with “accountability” – the idea that some readily identifiable official could be held accountable for the selection of any “officer” of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving threats made on social media. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:16 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    The case is Schindler Elevator Corp. v United States, 10-188. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
  She was appointed by the Court to make those arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]