Search for: ""California v. Hodari D." OR "499 U.S. 621""
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2010, 10:41 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), the Supreme Court arguably cast doubt on whether suppression is appropriate in this situation. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 626 (1991) ("An arrest requires either physical force (as described above) or, where that is absent, submission to the assertion of authority. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991) (holding that the standard "is an objective one: not whether the citizen perceived that he was being ordered to restrict his movement, but whether the officer's words and actions would have conveyed that to a reasonable person. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:38 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), which reformulated the definition of a seizure of a person under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:52 pm
Hodari D, 499 U.S. 621 (1991). [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:16 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 628 (1991). [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 1:31 am
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), about whether there was a different approach for applications of physical force to a person. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991). [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:34 pm
Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991) that a person is seized for Fourth Amendment purposes when (1) an officer applies physical force, however slight, to the person or (2) the person submits to an officer’s show of authority. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). [read post]
